An Unconventional Rebuilding Strategy

The MLB playoffs are looming. The Astros, my hometown boys, are long gone from the playoff hunt. We've traded away two of our best players in Hunter Pence and Michael Bourn, and are now fielding a team of youngsters hoping to make a splash against big league opponents as the train wreck of a 2011 season winds down for Houston.

With all of that said, there is a positive to be taken from this: I noticed that with all of the new players seeing major league time for the Astros, there seems to be an interesting connection running through several of the players. Their names all start with the letter J.

Now, having been an Astros fan back to the time of the Astrodome, I fondly remember the era of the Killer B's (Bagwell, Biggio, Derek Bell, and in the later years Lance Berkman). So we know that Houston's management has not been against constructing teams loosely-based on player names. Knowing that, take a look at the number of players on the current Astros roster who fit the criteria:

Juan Abreu

Jeff Fulchino

Jordan Lyles

Jason Castro

Jose Altuve

Jimmy Paredes

Jason Bourgeois

Jason Michaels

Jordan Schafer

And that's not all! Check out this fascinating list of players:

J.A. Happ

J.B. Shuck

J.D. Martinez

J.R. Towles

With this trend in mind, I propose we make some more additions to the roster to complete our overhaul this year. Let's trade for Atlanta Braves catcher J.C. Boscan, Orioles shortstop J.J. Hardy, Blue Jays catcher J.P. Arencibia, and bring back the ghost of former-San Francisco Giant 1st basemen J.T. Snow's career. Since we're undergoing an ownership change as it is, let's get rapper Jay-Z to chip into the ownership, and we can do this "J" thing right.

Lastly, I feel like a nickname would be fitting, similar to the "Killer B's". After thinking about it, my two thoughts would be the "Flying J's" to continue with the Astros' space theme, or my personal favorite of "The J Crew".

Go 'Stros!

Watch The Throne

When rumors started swirling that two of my favorite rappers (Jay-Z and Kanye West) were getting together for an album-long collaboration, I understandably got very excited. I bought Watch The Throne (WTT) about a week ago, and have been listening to it more or less nonstop since.

Three reasons why I like the album:

1. Kanye's beats are a better background than what a Jay album normally features. Jay-Z can rap over anything and make it sound awesome, but when it's over a thought-provoking, substantial soundtrack like Kanye's, it raises the bar significantly. My favorite beat of the album is "Otis", with honorable mention going to "New Day" and "Who Gon Stop Me".

2. Jay-Z brings better rapping "chops" to the album than what Kanye can consistently fit into a studio release. His ability to convey a lyrical metaphor throughout the entirety of a verse is better than any other rapper out there right now (see his Pledge of Allegiance analogy in "Made in America"). My favorite rapping display from Mr. Carter is on "HAM" (on the deluxe release), and then a very close second is on "N-Words in Paris". "Why I Love You" gets honorable mention.

3. The surprising debut of Frank Ocean! If he's been on something before this, I missed it. I've never heard of him before, but his voice on "No Church In The Wild" and especially "Made In America" is so freaking good. He's just got some really great vocal strength, and his control over his own voice lets his incredible tonal quality shine.

"Otis" is my favorite track. The perfect blend of Jay and 'Ye trading off over the Otis Redding sample of "Try A Little Tenderness" gets happily stuck in my head for hours at a time. It probably already is pushing my Top 25 Most Played list in iTunes, and rightfully so.

Basically, taking the best of both worlds (Kanye's soundtrack and Jay-Z's lyrics) makes for an incredible collaboration. The interludes linking the tracks throughout the album together are such a professional touch, and it really puts this record over the top. Throw in an up-and-comer singer in Frank Ocean, and that's just a nice cherry on top. Two thumbs up for WTT as a whole, and hopefully I can score some tickets to see "The Throne" on their tour!

(As a side note, I've recently discovered an incredible website for decoding some of the more difficult lyrical passages and references in rap: www.rapgenius.com. Self-described as "A Hip-Hop Wikipedia", it's a user-submitted, moderator-regulated discussion on rap lyrics and references, with a dash of humor thrown in. It's been a great sidekick for listening to new lyrics, as well as for going back and listening through the back catalog. Plus, I'm pretty sure it's run by some Ivy League-educated white guys, for what that's worth.)

SEC Rumors

The blog is back! After a prolonged absence, it's making a comeback - just like ugly clothes that you'd never be caught dead in....until they become trendy and retro.

A while ago, was it 6 months ago? maybe almost a full year? there were rumors circling surrounding college football and, more importantly, the Big 12. These rumors were brought on by the vacancies left in the Big 12 due to Nebraska leaving for the Big Ten (now to 12 teams), and Colorado's moving to the Pac-10, along with Utah (now the Pac-12). Right around that time, there was made known the possibility of Texas and most of the Big 12 South (OU, OSU, and Texas Tech) moving to the Pac-12 to become a super-conference of 16 teams. As an A&M fan and student, I was curious why the Ags hadn't been mentioned in the Super Pac conference rumors. Then, news broke that there were talks going on between TAMU and the SEC - so it all made sense. However, none of the big shakeup actually transpired, and the only tangible evidence that anything actually happened was the creation of the Longhorn Sports Network, Texas' own television station.

Arriving at the present, the LHN is about to begin it's first football season on the air, and the Big 12 (-2) will start its awkward schedule of playing each and every school in the conference every year. However, earlier this week my twitter timeline blew up with rumors once again circling that TAMU might move to the SEC. According to texags.com guru Billy Liucci's tweet, if A&M and the SEC agree on a deal within the month, the Ags can be playing in the SEC in 2012! Pretty cool idea, but is it the best thing for the Maroon and White?

My ideal situation is as follows: A&M moves to the SEC and joins the West division. The SEC adds another team (Clemson? Virginia Tech?) to even out the divisions at 7 apiece. Texas, now with its own TV deal in the LHN, goes independent. The Oklahoma, Kansas, and remaining schools from the now-defunct Big 12 regroup and form something resembling the old Big 8 (with more teams like TCU, Boise State, etc.).

What does this mean for Texas? They honestly have a big enough national audience and fan base to keep themselves afloat without conference ties, and can you imagine a yearly rivalry with Notre Dame? How crazy would that be? Also with the independence, you can keep the rivalry games with both OU and A&M, and not fight over the Big 12 South crown with Oklahoma, as has been the case for the past 10 years. Texas' schedule would have some cream puffs, as would be the case in a big-time conference, but would also have yearly games against OU, A&M, and Notre Dame with a possible Ohio State/USC rivalry renewed. Sounds like a win to me.

What does this mean for Texas A&M? Well, it's kind of out of the frying pan and into the fire, honestly. From the Big 12 South (Texas, OU, Ok State, Tech, and Baylor) to the new SEC West (Arkansas, LSU, Bama, Auburn, Ole Miss, and Mississippi State), you go from a bad draw to a worse draw. However, I think that with the Texas recruiting connection, A&M could definitely hang in there with the perennially elite teams in the country, and I could see the Aggies playing up to their competition. Also, in the basketball realm, TAMU could definitely excel after getting out from underneath KU's presence.

All told, I think A&M could adapt to contend in the SEC, Texas could excel as an independent school, and the rest of the Big 12 as we know it might be better off reshaping and melting into other conferences. Will all of this go according to my personal plan? Most likely not. But will something happen? I think so. Now it's just a matter of time.

Everyone's Doing Their Own Brackets

So with March Madness in full swing (the best month of the sports year!), I keep hearing different people doing their own versions of brackets. The bracket itself is such an interesting concept: rank things highest to lowest, square each of them off in pairs with the winner advancing, and eliminate until you're left with an eventual champion. Now with social networking and instant fan feedback, so many radio shows are doing bracket-style gimmicks in their shows. And let me be honest - I love it! It's kind of how my brain works, compare two things, pick the better of the two, and then decide how MUCH better it is than everything else. Simply fascinating.

Two brackets I've really liked recently have been music related: Colin Cowherd (on his radio show, The Herd) did a top music groups bracket, and then the local sports radio show around Houston (The Blitz) did a unique spin on that: worst musical groups, which I enjoyed so much. For instance, one of the second-round matchups squared off the New School boy band Jonas Brothers against the Old School boy band, Hanson. It was amazing! And the final was great too: Insane Clown Posse narrowly being defeated by David Hasselhoff. It definitely made listening to the radio on my lunch break suck that much less.

So with those two music-related brackets as guides, I had an idea: a bracket of the best bands of all time, seeded according to long-term success, and then having matchups set as each band's top 5 songs head-to-head, majority-rules.

That way, a band like Boston, who really only had one great album and then broke up, would be seeded low due to such a short-term lifespan - but then their top 5 hits are a murderer's row against the best of them: More Than A Feeling, Foreplay (Long Time), Smokin', Rock 'n Roll Band...I mean that's tough to beat. So, I like this idea, and I think that my four #1 seeds would be as follows (keeping in mind that these are for long-term success in the music industry): The Rolling Stones, U2, KISS, and Aerosmith.

The Beatles (my favorites to win it all, since I think they're the best band of all time) would land somewhere around a 3 seed? Because they were only a band from 1963-70, yet with that you forget that they put out at least an album a year, sometimes two. So they're not quite Coldplay, with 4 albums over 10 years of being a legitimate chart-topper, but they can be a dark horse and come from nowhere to win it all.

So go ahead and try to tell me this idea sucks, because it doesn't.

Down Goes Selena 2.0!

Okay, this is another American Idol breakdown, but I just think that the scenarios have changed slightly. So look at this as a progress report.

Here are my power rankings, and these are based on where I think they should go realistically (with only slight bias).

1 - James Durbin

2 - Jacob Lusk

3 - Casey Abrams

4 - Pia Toscano

5 - Stefano Langone

6 - Haley Reinhart

7 - Lauren Alaina

8 - Paul McDonald

9 - Scottie McCreery

10 - Thia Megia

11 - Naima Edadapo

First, the judges on the show have started to just fill roles in their post-performance critiques. Randy, as he always has, takes a very musical, note-by-note approach. That's fine, except that what he sometimes thinks are "hot", I don't agree with. Jennifer Lopez has transitioned nicely into the Paula Abdul vacancy, and she's an even bigger star than Abdul was so she has even more influence on these guys. This may sound crazy, but after the audition episodes, I thought that Steven Tyler was going to triumphantly take over the Simon Cowell role of tough-love critic. Then, he decided to take his cues from...Ellen Degeneres? Now he is just pumping these singers so full of inspiration that I'm afraid of an explosion of Care Bear lovey-dovey rainbows every time he opens his mouth.

Do I have a solution? Sure, I'm glad you asked! Randy, keep doing what you're doing - you and I may differ, but your opinion has been proven and it's respected. J.Lo, right on. You know where these people could possibly be headed, and you have good advice. Steven Tyler, please please please be the singer of good music that you are, and give them good advice and point out musical aspects of the songs. Also, keep cursing on camera - it's so funny to play "Is that a cable provider audio error or just Steven being Steven?"

Now to the competition. With Karen (aka Selena/J-Lo 2.0) voted off, there are now two more contestants who I think have no business being in the competition this late - namely Thia and Naima. Both are great singers, but they just don't have the chops to hang with the rest. The next two weeks, in a perfect world, would have the two of them leaving in no particular order.

A couple singers have been surprising to me - or rather, America's response has been surprising to some fairly unique voices. Where Casey seems to be a favorite in the competition, and Paul has been accepted for all of his dance moves and odd voice, I think that Haley has been sending in some absolute gems for a few weeks and has been getting killed for it. She's got that growl in her voice, which I think she uses tastefully, and isn't afraid to move around while she dances which is good. Granted, I know that it sounds differently when you're in the theater with them, so J.Lo saying that it looks awkward may have some merit to it. But I really think she's got a great voice, and where Randy says "what do you want to be? who are you as an artist?" I could construe as saying that she's super-versatile. Think about it, she sang Alicia Keys and then Lee Ann Rimes - in back-to-back weeks. That's why she's so high on my power rankings.

Lauren is legit, she had a bad week and was sick last week so she's not in the top 5 because of that and, honestly, that everyone in the top 5 might be a little better than her. But she could be a Carrie Underwood-type.

I'm pretty sure Scottie has already gotten calls from country producers offering him a job, and you know what? Keep it up bro! He knows what he can do, and he stinkin' does it. Right on.

My roommate told me this after hearing the last episode, and I agree with him. He said that he hopes Paul gets voted off soon, because if he does the fear is that he'll be shoehorned into a major record label-type of act. And I honestly think that he could be great if left to do his own thing without having to appease the American Idol producers.

Pia and Stefano are the two dark horses, who were kind of unheralded but now have proven to be amazing if given the right song. Pia has something about her where she can take on the divas and do them justice. Also, she has such as strong, controlled voice that she can go even higher after holding out a sustained note in the upper register. Listen for it next time, it's pretty remarkable. If Stefano could use last week as a blueprint, I see him becoming a Ne-Yo/Bruno Mars type. And I really like both of those guys.

James, Jacob, and Casey are still my favorites to win it all, and it's just a matter of who gets sick as to who will win. Jacob, though, needs to ease up a little. I like that he goes all the way up to 6th gear on the intensity, but I like to hear the soft and beautiful voice like he did on the last line of his song last week.

And Casey, do you now see why Nirvana has never been done? Yeah. I like the risk, but horrible execution. I won't say anything bad about James, you can't make me.

American Idol, are you serious?

I mean for real! After my boy, Taylor Hicks, won season 5 of American Idol, I swore off the show because I had reached the pinnacle - I had picked a guy in his first audition to win the whole thing. Also attributing to my American Idol sabbatical was the increase in gimmicks and tricks that the show kept throwing out there. It was honestly annoying, and if you don't agree then you must be the one person in the world who thinks that Ryan Seacrest is SO funny, and you probably actually like watching non-Super Bowl commercials. Be honest.

However, I started watching this season. What got me back into it? Honestly, I wanted to see Jennifer Lopez, Randy Jackson, and Steven Tyler ruin the show. I knew that Randy couldn't handle the show by himself, J-Lo would be too....I don't know, harsh? and that Steven Tyler would probably fill his Coca-Cola sponsored cup with LSD and trip out on national TV. So I started watching. And you know what? I like it! I was right, Randy can't carry the load, but he doesn't need too - this group is sharing the load, like the '00 Ravens, or the '04 Pistons, or the '10 San Francisco Giants. They're sharing the ball, and it's really working.

As a side note, I'm pretty sure that Steven Tyler has in his contract somewhere that he can do whatever he wants. And I'm sure that Ryan Seacrest - ever the drama queen - loves it, and caters to it. Seriously, how long until he gets to bring a pet into auditions one year? Or he makes out with a hot girl (or guy? ew jordan...stop) after some face-melting solo.

So here's what I think of the current top 10 (+3). Because it's not the top 13 according to TV Guide...thanks a lot, show riggers. The girls are clearly shallower in depth, so I'll start with them. Lauren Alaina and Hailey Reinhart could win the whole thing, but each would have to surprise me. Hailey KILLED it this week with Alicia Keys' "Fallin'", and Lauren actually sang a song that I didn't like. But like a consummate professional, she made a 4 sound like an 8, and a song choice that should have made her nervous in any other year sent her sailing through to the next round. Thia Megia could be something special, but has yet to prove to me that she's good enough to make into the Hailey-Lauren echelon. Naima is really good, but won't last - and Ashthon is solid, but doesn't do anything special for me...and you need that to separate yourself. Pia sang The Pretenders' "I'll Stand By You" so well this week, and me and my roommate were blown away by it - but it's really the first time I've looked at her twice, so it's too soon to place her. I really like Karen Rodriguez, and I'd say her consistency puts her in a class of her own directly below the Hailey-Lauren line. The girls, however, are weak compared to the guys, and I still think that only Lauren or maybe Hailey can win it all.

As for the guys, unfortunately, it's a two-man race. Stefano is really good, he's got such a powerfully high voice for only being like 5'5'', but his time on the show is dwindling because he doesn't have the depth of range of his peers.

Can I just say that Tim Halperin is good enough to make it ANY other year?! So good, and I really think that a bad song choice led him to an early exit. Plus, he's friends with a guy I knew from high school, so it was cool to see Aaron Mullenix on my TV for the past few weeks.

Scotty, the low-singing baseball pitcher, is Mr. Country this year. He knows his strike zone, and isn't willing to chase. He's like Tony Gwynn, he won't hit many home runs, but every time out you expect him to make solid contact. And you know what? I think it could get him to go really far this season.

I love Paul McDonald, and his quirky voice and fashion sense. First of all, props for going all-black, and the coat tails were very cool. He knows what he can do, and with his raspy voice he can take any song and make it his own without trying too hard. However, I don't think the American public will appreciate him as much as he should be, so I think he's on his last legs here. Shame.

Casey Abrams, if anyone, could catch the two frontrunners. However, the bearded eccentric will have to set the WORLD on fire if he plans on catching them...kind of like he did this week. His personality really shows when he sings, and it's very endearing. He's a mainstay in the show for sure, and he is must-see TV.

Now Jacob Lusk and James Durbin are 1-2 in some order, depending on the day. For me, I think that this week Jacob's Vandross song "A House Is Not A Home" barely edges out James's "You Got Another Thing Coming". Lusk was emotional, and Durbin was playful and energetic, and it's really like a difference between 9.9 and a 9.8 but still. One thing that I think will be interesting to watch will be to see how well Jacob can do the faster songs. He's got the heart-wrenchers down to an art, but can he awkwardly bounce around the stage? Even if he can't, he's still miles in front of 3rd place. And let it be known that Durbin can do almost no wrong in my eyes. So there.

Final prediction: 1st - Lusk, 2nd - Durbin

The Houston Rockets

I never thought I'd say this, but I am beginning to be a fan of none other than the Houston Rockets basketball team in the National Basketball Association. Like, a legitimate fan. For around 12 years now, I've lived in Houston. I have been a die-hard Astros fan for each and every year of that span (dating back to the Carl Everett, Mike Hampton, and Jose Lima days), but have never really followed the Rockets very intently. Sure, I'd cheer for them or watch if the games were on, but I never made it a point to watch.

Well, that sure has changed. I've watched more NBA games this season than I ever have, and have seen nearly every game played by the Rockets this season. As for my fanhood, I'm a fan of the hometown boys, LeBron and the Heatles, and several individual players throughout the league (Chris Paul, Kevin Durant, and Stephen Curry, to name a few). With the trade deadline recently having passed, and the most exciting part of the NBA season looming on the near horizon, I figured I'd break down some thoughts on the new and (hopefully) improved Houston Rockets.

First, I like Rick Adelman. He's got a good demeanor on the court with the pacing and instructing his players. He seems to fight for his players with the referees without ever going postal and trying to make himself the focal point of the game. In the post-game press conferences and interviews, he seems to have good perspective and makes it easy for the media members to glean quotes from him for their articles and pieces. He's not the best coach in the league, but he only adds to this team and takes nothing away.

Secondly, I'll discuss GM Daryl Morey and the new arrivals/departures from the recent trades. Morey, from everything I've read and heard, seems to be a pioneer in the NBA landscape. He's very statistically-driven (even co-chairing the MIT Sloan Sports Conference, a Mensa-meeting-type feel of sports stats nuts) and seems to never accept the Rockets in their current state. It's that drive to always strive for more that I think will make the team competitive each year for as long as he's here. Will he make some mistakes? Sure, he might trade/release a guy who goes on to have a revitalized career or sign someone who was only a flash in the pan. However, the overall feel of his managerial style shows that he's got a great feel for what Adelman needs as far as tools to make this team win, and his trade moves reflect that.

For instance, trading fan-favorite Shane Battier along with Ish Smith for Hasheem Thabeet and Demarre Carroll and a first-round pick is a very pro-active move that will hopefully serve to give some worthy bench guys some minutes. Battier is an excellent player and a good team guy, but his contract is expiring and I at least would rather move him too soon than too late. Thabeet (who looks like a character straight out of Avatar - don't lie, you see it too!) is still very young, and he could be a serviceable center in the league. I mean, look at what we did with 6'6'' Chuck Hayes! Also, call me crazy but I watched Carroll in college (at Mizzou), and he's not a bad player at all. Think Patrick Patterson but a little more pass-heavy, like Pistons rookie Greg Monroe.

The other Rockets trade sent point guard Aaron Brooks to the Suns for their Slovenian backup Goran Dragic and a pick. Brooks really didn't do a whole lot for me as a fan, but that's probably because I didn't get to see him in his excellence last year and only in his conflict-ridden season this year (storming off the court and receiving a suspension for it). Dragic set the world on fire with an excellent playoff series against the Spurs in 2010, and ever since then I have been a fan of his. He has an excellent motor, isn't afraid to mix it up (as evidenced by a verbal tussle with Sasha Vujacic in last year's playoffs...but seriously Vujacic had it coming. The dude's a whimp.), and loves to drive to the lane and kick it out to a thankful 3-point shooter. Brooks will be missed, but I like the move and what it brings to starter Kyle Lowry.

I'm sorry, did someone say Kyle Lowry?! Well then, I'd love to put my two cents in. I've watched Kyle Lowry snag (and then firmly put his stamp on) the starting point guard job. He's lighting it up from 3, and brings a junkyard-dog feel to the team that I love. For all of Kevin Martin's whiny acting jobs, Lowry matches those performances with a hard and-1 to the basket or an open-court steal and bucket on the break. He has quickly become my favorite Rocket.

Other bright spots obviously include Martin, who was NBA player of the week last week, rookie Patrick Patterson who has been playing like a veteran, and severely-undersized Chuck Hayes (or The Chuckwagon, as FSN announcers Matt Bullard and Bill Worrell affectionately call him) who consistently turns out double-doubles and guards some of the toughest power forwards in the league. I love Luis Scola's offensive game, and he has recently stepped it up with some charge-taking performances on the defensive end too. Courtney Lee quite possibly is the most athletic Rocket, and I love his game on both ends. I've actually had a soft-spot in my heart for him ever since his dagger 3 in the first round of the NCAA tournament a few years ago with Western Kentucky - even though he screwed over my bracket.

Brad Miller has had better times than he's playing right now, and I wish that he'd bring some toughness along with his height to the second-team. I'm not too high on Kevin Martin actually, but like every long-time Laker fan will tell you about Kobe, you don't complain about results.

Where do I see the Rockets going? I hope they can get a playoff spot, and I think it's very possible. However, barring a crazy run or some meteoric collapses from the bottom-half of the playoff brackets I don't foresee the Rockets moving out of the first round. However, the future looks bright for this team, and I will definitely be watching intently to see how the season plays out.