I am a man. I am a poet. I am redeemed.

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Denver Nuggets

Sorry Nuggets fans: Jusuf Nurkic is a soft-smiler. And thus, he can't be trusted.

The List:

1. Ty Lawson - PG 15.2ppg, 9.6apg, 1.2spg, 18.5 PER

Tywon (what a great name. I wonder if he's popular in Southeast Asia?) has proven through his 5 years in the league that he's a capable point guard, which is by far the deepest position for good/great/elite players, so that's quite a compliment. And this year in particular was a good one for Lawson - anytime you can average 15/10 while playing in 75 games, that's nothing to sneeze at. Two other things that Lawson brings to the table: he's one of the fastest guys in the league and he makes that speed a factor in his game (probably the second-best at that, behind John Wall), and then he makes enough of his 3's to keep you honest (he hit a career-low 34% this year). Additionally, at 5'11'' (listed) he's one of the shortest starters in the NBA. Respect.

2. Kenneth Faried - PF 12.6ppg, 8.9rpg, 1.6 "stocks" per game (steals+blocks), 18.5 PER

"The Manimal" had a little bit of a down year this year. That is to say, he essentially had a carbon-copy (that's such an outdated phrase - seriously, when was the last time you actually kept one of those "yellow copies" or whatever they give you for a receipt?) statistical year as his previous 2 years. So what's wrong with that? Well, "we" the viewing public called for Faried to do what all great superstars do: go from good to great. And by repeating his insane line of rebounding, low-post defense extending to the perimeter, and average big-man scoring, The Manimal has proven that what you see is what you get with him. And that's enough. He'll never be DeMarcus Cousins, so we should all stop expecting that of him.

3. Danilo Gallinari - SF 12.4ppg, 40% 3FG, 0.8spg, 16.8 PER

"The Rooster" has that gift: he makes throwing the orange, round ball into the tall rim-and-net contraption look so easy. Dude can score, and he makes it look so...Italian. Confident, relaxed, and made completely of cheese and tomato sauce. Unfortunately, Danilo hasn't been gifted with the rebounding gene - that must be native to Detroit (what with Dennis Rodman and Ben Wallace's careers taking off there). My guess, while unaided by actually watching many Nuggets games, is that Gallo's high steals numbers are because he's cheating and gambling on the defensive end - not because he's a stalwart.

4. Wilson Chandler - SF 13.9ppg, 6.1rpg, 13.9 PER

Chandler is like Gallinari's long-lost twin - another gifted scorer, but exchange Gallo's odd steals numbers with Chandler's rebounding numbers. I mean, I've never seen him work hard on the boards, so when is he getting these rebounds? Baffling. Wilson Chandler also has the best neck tattoo this side of DeShawn Stevenson.

Creepy tat game strong. It's like the other face is trying to sneak up out of his jersey.

Sorry Wilson, but you can't beat MONEY ON YOUR THROAT.

5. Jusuf Nurkic - C 6.9ppg, 6.2rpg, 1.1bpg, 14.8 PER

Nurkic came out of mild obscurity (he was taken in the 1st round of the 2014 draft, but there are other international guys taken in the 1st round haven't even stepped foot in the US yet) to be an impactful backup big guy in his first season with the Nuggets. Big and strong, Denver is undoubtedly hoping that Jusuf can keep the defensive prowess working while he becomes more adept on the offensive end.

6. JJ Hickson - PF 7.6ppg, 6.2rpg, 14.4 PER

JJ has been a high-energy big man ever since his days at NC State, but he's come to carve out his niche as a rebounding machine - especially given his per-minute stats.

7. Will Barton - SG 6.8ppg, 2.8rpg, 13.6 PER

"The People's Champ", as he was nicknamed when he played in Portland, has been an under-the-radar talent during his 3 years in the league. Involved in the midseason trade that sent Arron Afflalo to Portland, Barton had a chance to change scenery, and he took to it very well - filling the role of bench scorer. Barton plays in such a way that his outgoing personality can be easily seen whenever he's on the court - the people of Denver would be wise to adopt him as their champ too.

8. Randy Foye - SG 8.7ppg, 2.4apg, 11.0 PER

Well, things have definitely been better for Raaaaaandy (thank you, Aziz Ansari). In a year where Foye saw almost all his averages decrease, as well as his total minutes played and games played in general, newcomer Will Barton added insult to injury by proving that he could handle the load of playing the 2-spot. Next year, the reins should be handed over even more, so hopefully Foye transitions from the "it man" like he had been during his time with the Timberwolves and Clippers, to a wizened veteran bestowing knowledge on the young'un.

9. Jameer Nelson - PG 8.3ppg, 4.0apg, 35% 3FG, 12.1 PER

Remember when Jameer Nelson was an All-Star in 2008-09, and then got hurt right before the ASG itself? Well, Jameer is probably still recovering from that, because he's never been the same. Dude used to ball out at St. Joe's though.

10. Darrell Arthur - PF 6.6ppg, 2.9rpg, 11.6 PER

One of the guys who, coming out of college (Kansas), I figured was a can't-miss. I also went to Texas A&M, who made losing to Kansas their personal mission every year - so I saw quite a few good games out of Mr. Arthur. However, Darrell hasn't lived up to my personal hype for him. For his size, and for his sheer talent level, Arthur should rebound at a better clip, which would lead to increased point-production.

11. Joffrey Lauvergne - PF 3.9ppg, 3.2rpg, 10.5 PER

Denver's "fall-off-the-cliff" section of their roster is larger than most teams, so these last 5 guys aren't such hot commodities. Interesting about Lauvergne: he has a higher usage rate than even JJ Hickson - basically, dude is a total ball hog.

12. Gary Harris - SG 3.4ppg, 20% 3FG, 5.0 PER

A 1st-round draft pick last year, Harris came into the year with moderate expectations on his game - and underwhelmed. He shot 30% from the field, and 20% from 3 - and yet still found his way onto the court in 55 games this season.

13. Erick Green - PG 3.4ppg, 0.9apg, 9.0 PER

A late 2nd-round pick two years ago, Green is a bit of a success story, given the expectations and the fact that he played in over half of Denver's games this year. He also has a near-3:1 assist/turnover ratio! That's pretty neat.

14. Ian Clark - SG 1.9ppg, 36% 3FG, 8.9 PER

I know you're curious what I've got to say about Ian Clark, who played in 7 of Denver's games. But I'm not going to let you know. So there!

15. Jamaal Franklin - SG 1.0ppg, 1.0apg, 4.9 PER

Jamaal wears number 99. That's ballsy.

Saturday, April 25, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Sacramento Kings

About a week ago, I began the massive undertaking of ranking every player in the NBA, breaking it up by going team-by-team before compiling all 30 teams' rankings into a huge, 450-player list. To read more about my thought process going into this, or to understand the criteria of how rankings are determined, see the first rankings here.

Does anyone remember back in October/November, when the Kings were absolutely on fire - and the toast of the entire league? Me neither. So much has changed since those days. One thing that changed for the better, however, is that DeMarcus Cousins went from being "good but crazy" to "great but crazy". And he only had 14 technical fouls this season (he had 17 last season, which led the league)!!! Now that George Karl is behind the wheel of Vivek Ranadive's Great Experiment, this team could actually begin to jell next season, and potentially vault themselves into the playoffs.

The List:

1. DeMarcus Cousins - C 24.1ppg, 12.7rpg, 3.2 "stocks" per game (steals+blocks), 25.3 PER

DeMarcus reminds me of Shaq. Force of nature offensively, good player defensively helped in large part to his size/athleticism combination, and a total head case off the court that makes you question whether he's worth the trouble. Now, if you've got a good organization, the answer to that question is a resounding YES (think Rob Gronkowski in New England). This may not apply to the Sacramento Kings.

2. Rudy Gay - SF 21.1ppg, 5.9rpg, 3.7apg, 19.8 PER

Gay went from being a ball-hogging, offense-clogging wash-up to actually having a great 2014-15 season with the Kings. At his peak, he is a light-defense, clutch-offense leader on a good playoff team. I'll give him half-credit for that, since this is anything but a good playoff team. However, the line between "light-defense, clutch-offense leader" and "no-defense, last-shot-clanging grumpy old man" is a little hazier than you might think.

3. Darren Collison - PG 16.1ppg, 5.6apg, 1.5spg, 37% 3FG, 17.5 PER

Ever since he was at UCLA, I've liked Darren Collison. Sometimes this hasn't gone my way (like when I thought that he would be better in the NBA than fellow Bruin teammate Russell Westbrook), but when Collison has a year like he did in 2014-15, I feel pretty vindicated in my admiration. The points and the assists are there, and they'll continue to be so pretty consistently. Collison adds the sneaky-good aspects of a high-level point guard, though - steals on the defensive end, and the ability to consistently knock down 3's.

4. Ben McLemore - SG 12.1ppg, 36% 3FG, 10.4 PER

Don't get me wrong - McLemore didn't have a breakout year by any means. He played in every game though, and played in 33 minutes per game, so he proved that he was worth being out there on the court. Now, is that because his backup was the even-less-efficient Nik Stauskas? Possibly. But Mac's proof that he can cut it on an NBA court, and deal with the grind of the regular season, makes me feel pretty hopeful about that breakout season coming in 2015-16 for McLemore.

5. Carl Landry - PF 7.2ppg, 3.8rpg, 51% FG, 14.9 PER

Landry has always been one of my favorite offensive-minded forwards coming off the bench, going back to when he played in Houston. He's a polished low-post scorer, but hasn't played enough defense to crack the starting lineup very often throughout his career.

6. Omri Casspi - SF 8.9ppg, 40% 3FG, 14.5 PER

Casspi is a great "intangibles guy". One of (if not the only?) Israeli players in the NBA, Omri made a career-high percentage of his 3's this year. At age 26, it seems like this is "peak-Omri," but that peak level of play is definitely capable of being a key role player on a good team.

7. Ray McCallum - PG 7.4ppg, 2.8apg, 12.5 PER

McCallum has a good compilation of skills in his arsenal. His 3-point percentage dropped off in his 2nd year, but that's usually one of the last things that point guards add to their games. He can act as a very capable backup (in the JJ Barea mold) to Darren Collison.

8. Andre Miller - PG 4.4ppg, 3.5apg, 13.4 PER

How old is Andre Miller (or "The Professor", as Grantland's Zach Lowe affectionately calls him)? Jahlil Okafor, the hopeful #1 pick in the upcoming NBA draft this year, was born when Miller was in his freshman season at the University of Utah.

Andre Miller is undergoing the metamorphosis we call "George Jefferson-ing".

9. Jason Thompson - PF 6.1ppg, 6.5rpg, 10.2 PER

Thompson is a hard-working, productive player whose effect on the court isn't fully captured in his stats. However, it's not by that much. The one thing that the NBA has a bunch of is hard-working big men who can't score.

10. Derrick Williams - PF 8.3ppg, 2.7rpg, 12.9 PER

It's hard to project how NCAA success will translate to NBA success. Case in point: Derrick Williams vs. Kemba Walker. Both players were standouts in college (Williams went to Arizona, Kemba to UConn), and took their respective teams on their backs tho. Coming into the league, Kemba is now a standout on his semi-competitive Hornets team, while Williams has been a bust (drafted 2nd overall, 7 picks ahead of Walker). I don't get it.

11. Nik Stauskas - SG 4.4ppg, 36% FG, 32% 3FG, 7.5 PER

The only thing that separates "Sauce Castillo" from the guys below him is his potential as a player. Young Sauce had a really underwhelming year, especially based on the expectations the front office had for him by drafting him 8th overall last year (ahead of both Elfrid Payton and Zach LaVine). He has the talent to be an impact player, it may just take a while to adjust to the NBA game.

12. Reggie Evans - C 3.7ppg, 6.4rpg, 11.7 PER

The only reason why Evans ranks higher than Hollins is because I'm a little bit scared of Reggie Evans.

13. Ryan Hollins - C 3.0ppg, 2.2rpg, 13.2 PER

Hollins and Evans are basically the same player, stats-wise - big men who add energy on the defensive end, while trying to stand on the baseline on offense and blend in with the stanchion so you forget they're there.

14. David Stockton - PG 2.7ppg, 3.0apg, 10.8 PER

In 3 games played, the son of the all-time assists leader averaged more dimes per game (3.0) than points per game (2.7). Well done, bud. Just like dad taught you.

15. Eric Moreland - PF Injured (No stats, or at least not really)

In 2 minutes played this season, Moreland had a 40.9 PER. Why isn't he starting every game?!? He puts Anthony Davis' historic PER to shame!

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Orlando Magic

James Franco didn't take his time when traveling in The Abyss known as the bottom-half of the Magic roster. And look what it cost him.

The List:

1. Victor Oladipo - SG 17.9ppg, 4.1apg, 4.2rpg, 1.7spg, 16.0 PER

2014-15 was the Season of Oladipo. Just kidding, he played on a team that won a total of 25 games, and didn't really have expectations of the playoffs all season. But Oladipo grabbed the starting 2-guard spot by the throat and never looked back, and used his increased minutes to raise his points per game, while reducing his turnovers per game. He shot at a better rate from everywhere on the court, and proved that the stat-sheet-stuffing aspect of his game is for real (just look at the steals!). He also proved that he's a great singer, and can jump a little bit. Or maybe those adjectives (adverbs?) should be reversed. Whatever.

2. Nikola Vucevic - C 19.3ppg, 10.9rpg, 1.4 "stocks" per game (steals+blocks), 21.6 PER

Nik Vuc is a double-double machine: his 45 were good enough for 5th in the league, and among those 5 players he averaged the second-most points, behind only DeMarcus Cousins. Vucevic was actually drafted by the Sixers, and was let go after one season (oops), and has come to find a home in Orlando. He's solid on defense - not a stand-out by any means - so his path forward should be clear there. Coolest part of NikVuc's game? 3+ offensive rebounds per game, and he's averaged that for 3 years in a row. That just speaks to his productive work down low, keeping possessions alive.

3. Tobias Harris - SF 17.1ppg, 6.3rpg, 1.0spg, 36% 3FG, 16.8 PER

Tobias Harris is a sneaky-favorite of mine. He seems to do everything on the court, like a not-completely-crazy Josh Smith. Dude is HUGE (6'9'', 235lbs), and he can shoot, has active hands, and can block a shot or two. One aspect of his game that's heading in the wrong direction: as his playing time and experience in the NBA has increased, Harris has started fouling and turning the ball over at increasing rates. Just wait until his hometown fans start booing whenever he lines up to take yet another 3, and then you'll know that he's gone complete Josh Smith. Once that (inevitably) happens, here's hoping he comes to Houston too!

4. Elfrid Payton - PG 8.9ppg, 6.5apg, 4.3rpg, 1.7spg, 13.9 PER

In his rookie season, the Louisiana-Lafayette product played extraordinarily well. He played in every game, started in 63 of them, and was allowed to legally buy alcohol in mid-February. Not a good shooter yet (he drove to the basket 2nd-most on the team behind Oladipo, and shot jumpers at a very low rate), he scored enough to have 12 double-doubles, even turning 2 triple-doubles. He turned the ball over too much (2.5 per game), but made up for it with a 2.6 assist:turnover ratio. In other words, that's a lot of assists coming out of Payton's dazzling handles. The company of this comparison may be too elevated for Payton, but if Elfrid aims more for Jason Kidd, and less for Rajon Rondo, then the sky is the limit for him.

5. Kyle O'Quinn - PF 5.8ppg, 3.9rpg, 0.8bpg, 14.9 PER

O'Quinn is a banger under the basket who tried to stretch his offensive game this season by (unsuccessfully) incorporating a 3-pointer into his arsenal. Not a gifted rebounder, especially for his size, O'Quinn adds enough of a presence in the middle on D to carry his own.

6. Evan Fournier - SG 12.0ppg, 38% 3FG, 12.5 PER

The Frenchman showed flashes of true competence in his first two years in Denver, and when he arrived in Orlando this year he...basically produced at the same rate, only this time with double the minutes. Fournier could be a "3-and-D" guy on a playoff contender, but on this team he slogged through the season and put up stats.

7. Aaron Gordon - PF 5.2ppg, 3.6rpg, 11.5 PER

The Magic's 1st-round draft pick from last year, Gordon (who wears #00, which is...simply Ostertag-ian) sputtered coming out of the gate as he adjusted to the NBA game. A standout during his time at Arizona in college, Gordon has the tools to improve - and if/when he starts progressing, current roadblock O'Quinn stands no chance to hold Gordon back.

8. Channing Frye - PF 7.3ppg, 3.9rpg, 39% 3FG, 9.5 PER

A prototypical "stretch-4", Frye loves to hover around the 3-point line and was the recipient of many kick-out passes from slashing guards Oladipo and Payton. I wish I could say that Frye adds more to the team than his stats line may suggest, but there's not much else there, really.

9. Dewayne Dedmon - C 3.7ppg, 5.0rpg, 0.8bpg, 13.3 PER

Hard-working big man, Dedmon worked his way into lots of minutes and saw a dramatic increase in his mpg and games played. There doesn't seem to be much more improvement there for Dedmon, but you never know - I also thought that DeAndre Jordan would never amount to anything. So pretty much, Dewayne Dedmon - your Defensive Player of the Year 2016!

10. Ben Gordon - SG 6.2ppg, 36% 3FG, 10.7 PER

Ben Gordon used to be amazing. Now the Englishman (isn't that weird?) plays a career-low in minutes, and impacts the game even less with his microwave-ready scoring. Sad, because Gordon used to be a Sportscenter highlight waiting to happen back in the Chicago days.

11. Luke Ridnour - PG 4.0ppg, 2.0apg, 10.0 PER

At one point, Ridnour was a capable backup point guard who could capably fill in while your starter sucked wind and gulped down Red Bull (hidden in those "water" cups) on the sidelines. However, when your starter is an absolute freak of nature mini-Rondo like Payton, the chasm of production widens whenever he's out of the game. Add that to an aging Ridnour (he's now 33), and you see lots of 4-point deficits turning into blowouts midway through the second quarter.

12. Andrew Nicholson - PF 4.9ppg, 2.1rpg, 10.4 PER

Same song, different verse: Nicholson is Orlando's version of the backup big man. Although Nicholson doesn't make as large of a dent in the rebounding portion of the game as most teams get from their backup bigs. Maybe NikVuc is just taking all of them, and Nicholson is left with meager table scraps.

13. Willie Green - SG 5.9ppg, 35% 3FG, 8.0 PER

Gone are the days when Willie Green was sharing a backcourt in the playoffs with Chris Paul. Now 33, Green continues to get minutes in games, but his production has fallen off drastically.

14. Maurice Harkless - SF 3.5ppg, 2.4rpg, 8.4 PER

Kanye is wondering, how could you be Mo Harkless? (Props to NBATV's JE Skeets for that one) Harkless fell off the map this season - cutting his scoring in half from last year, and playing in half as many games. For a player with some considerable potential, here's hoping that he turns things around in the future.

15. Devyn Marble - SF 2.3ppg, 1.9rpg, 5.9 PER

Devyn is really just happy that he qualifies for this list.

Monday, April 20, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Los Angeles Lakers

A few days ago, I began the massive undertaking of ranking every player in the NBA, breaking it up by going team-by-team before compiling all 30 teams' rankings into a huge, 450-player list. To read more about my thought process going into this, or to understand the criteria of how rankings are determined, see the first rankings here.

The Lakers haven't been good for, well...at least a few seasons now (they haven't won a playoff series since 2011-12), and injuries cost this team a bunch of minutes from key players (and Steve Nash even retired mid-season, so he's not listed below). So, it's hard to know how the roster will come together next season. One thing about this roster: down here in the NBA standings, among the lottery teams, there seem to be 2 types of roster compilation - old players holding on to primes long gone (like the Knicks/Lakers), or a bunch of too-young players with high potentials that are as-yet unreached (like the T-Wolves/Sixers). So yeah.

Now, one way to upgrade this roster in a hurry is to recruit high-dollar free agents to come and play. However, one player on the Lakers (his name rhymes with Moby and you don't have to go too far down the list to find him) has been rumored to be a little...difficult to play with. So free agents don't want to join up on Team Purple 'n' Gold, but ownership says that's okay, you're a loser and we don't want you anyway.

Jeanie Buss's message to LaMarcus Aldridge, Marc Gasol, Kevin Love, etc...

So what's the only other way to bring this franchise back to prominence? Through the long, arduous process of rebuilding through the draft. Better start calling Sam Hinkie in Philly and asking him pretty please with some sugar on top for some of his 2nd-round picks.

The List:

1. Kobe Bryant - SG 22.3ppg, 5.7rpg, 5.6apg, 1.34spg, 17.7 PER

Like with Melo in New York, don't overthink this one: Kobe is by far the best player on this team. He is a pretty good defender (or maybe he's started gambling for steals on the defensive end), and lead the team in assists/game (in the half of the season that he played). Dude can still score, too - although not at an efficient rate anymore. He takes 20 shots/game, which is double anyone else on the team not named Nick Young. Definitely one of the best guards to ever play the game, but no longer one of the elite guards in the NBA anymore. On this roster, he's still the king though.

2. Nick Young - SF 13.4ppg, 37% 3FG, 14.3 PER

Swaggy P has the coolest reason for abstaining from tattoos on his right arm, and damn does he shoot enough to make up for the lack of ink. Filling the role of "bench scorer", Young really doesn't add anything else to the game but shot attempts and shots made. But he CAN shoot, and that's valuable.

3. Jordan Hill - C 12.0ppg, 7.9rpg, 16.2 PER

Finally, in his 5th year in the league and on a team full of shot-happy backcourt players, Hill set a new career-high in rpg by adding almost 2 per game. He also took 4 more shots per game this year, which led to him setting a career-high in points as well. Not a force on the defensive end though, so if he can improve on that end as much as he has on the offensive end the past few seasons, he could go from bad-team-good-stats guy to "good player" status.

4. Ed Davis - PF 8.3ppg, 7.6rpg, 1.86 "stocks"/game (steals+blocks), 20.0 PER

Ed Davis seems to be Jordan Hill's foil - everything that Hill is (gifted offensive player, sluggish defensively), Davis is the opposite. He's always been a good defensive player, even straight out of UNC, but hasn't really ever seen his offensive game round into anything consistent.

5. Jeremy Lin - PG 11.2ppg, 4.6apg, 1.1spg, 15.7 PER

Well, it's been 3+ years since the Year of Linsanity when Lin took the league by storm for a 3-week stretch, and where are we now? Lin is still in the league (and making some good money thanks to Rockets GM Daryl Morey), still driving to the basket a bunch (he took the most driving shots on the team, almost 2x as many as second-place Jordan Clarkson), still making enough 3's to keep you honest (he's actually improved his percentages each year), and still jumping passing routes and picking pockets (he's averaged 1.3spg for his entire career). So, what can we deduce about Jeremy Lin? That what you see is what you get. And if you're the Lakers, what you get is a solid backup point guard.

6. Jordan Clarkson - PG 11.9ppg, 3.5apg, 16.9 PER

Clarkson was the breakout player of the year by far for the Lake Show, and it's clear to see why: he comes from nowhere (drafted in the second round), starts on an injury-riddled roster, and steps in capably. He shot well this season (45% from the field), had more than 2x as many assists as turnovers, and at the end of the year he had started 38 of the 59 games he played. The standards weren't set very high for Clarkson coming into this season, but needless to say he outperformed them.

7. Julius Randle - PF Injured in his 1st game, no stats (but he had a -7.5 PER, which is pretty funny)

Sad that Randle got hurt for the entire year, because his game seemed the most adaptable of the 3 intriguing rookies coming into this year (along with Andrew Wiggins, who shined, and Jabari Parker, who also shined before getting hurt). So, given the performance of the other two rookies, I assume that Randle should adapt well when he finally gets out on the court.

8. Carlos Boozer - PF 11.8ppg, 6.8rpg, 16.5 PER

The loudest screamer of "And-One!" I've ever heard in basketball, Booze is completely washed up at this point. He doesn't defend in the slightest, and his offensive game is comprised solely of 15-foot jumpers and begging the refs for calls down low. Every dog has his day, and Boozer's ended 5 years ago.

9. Tarik Black - PF 6.0ppg, 5.8rpg, 14.8 PER

Black spent time in Houston before being traded to the Lakers this season, and was a capable backup big-man. However, he hasn't shown any potential to develop an offensive game (72% of his shot were from 3ft away from the basket or closer), so this is probably his ceiling as far as potential goes.

10. Wayne Ellington - SG 10.0ppg, 37% 3FG, 11.7 PER

Ellington is an all-offense shooting guard, and this season took 100 more 3's than his previous high, while hitting a healthy percentage of them. There's a spot on a good team's roster for a 3-point specialist, but we're seeing them make a bigger imprint on the defensive end (Danny Green, for example, averaged 2+ "stocks" per game this season) in addition to the sharp-shooting.

11. Ronnie Price - PG 5.1ppg, 3.8apg, 1.6spg, 10.2 PER

Good steals numbers, but not much else from the "crafty veteran" - aka a player who sticks in the league without really giving any evidence as to why. Here's an interesting tidbit: at 6'2'', Price is the shortest player on the Lakers roster. What, there's not much to say here!

12. Wesley Johnson - SF 9.9ppg, 4.2rpg, 35% 3FG, 11.1 PER

Yet another 1st-round bust, Johnson was taken one pick before some guy named DeMarcus Cousins (sorry, Timberwolves fans). He's proven that he can shoot the 3 a little bit, and he shot a bunch of them, second only to Ellington in sheer volume this season.

13. Robert Sacre - C 4.6ppg, 3.5rpg, 10.9 PER

Robert Sacre is an energy big-man who doesn't score, rebound, or defend very well. That's not very valuable.

14. Jabari Brown - SG 11.9ppg, 37% 3FG, 11.0 PER

Yup, never heard of this guy before I started researching.

15. Ryan Kelly - PF 6.4ppg, 33% 3FG, 8.6 PER

Kelly is filling that ever-important Mark Madsen/Adam Morrison role of "white guy on the Lakers bench". For the record, since I know this is the best place to say this, I see a lot of parallels between Ryan Kelly's playing career at Duke and Frank Kaminsky's at Wisconsin. A cautionary tale for Frank the Tank.

Saturday, April 18, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Philadelphia 76ers

Sam Hinkie and Brett Brown: the Dr. Frankenstein and Igor of the NBA, constructing a monster made up mostly of 2nd-round draft picks. (Brought to you by Gatorade)

The List:

1. Nerlens Noel - C 9.9ppg, 8.1rpg, 3.7"stocks"/game (steals+blocks), 15.0 PER

Nerlens is already an incredible NBA defender, even for the high standard of defensive prowess that we've come to expect from centers in the league. Hopefully his offensive game follows the Dwight Howard progression, because Noel definitely has that kind of potential.

2. Robert Covington - SF 13.5ppg, 37% 3FG, 14.7 PER

Beloved by the Philly faithful, Covington played well this entire season. Defensively, Covington has active hands (1.4spg), but most of his value comes on the offensive end of things. 37% from 3, 82% free throw percentage, and scored 13.5 a game and led the team in scoring while being 4th on the team in usage rate.

3. Joel Embiid - C No stats (Injured all season)

This ranking is basically an assumption based on Embiid's potential. Embiid is also one of the rawest prospects to have come out of the draft last season, and is years away from even being at the point of his projection that Noel is at currently. But the ceiling is high on Embiid, if he can just unlock the potential.

4. Tony Wroten - SG 16.9ppg, 5.2apg, 26% 3FG, 15.0 PER

The stats for this year are deceptive, since Wroten played less than half of the season. However, taking 2013-14 into account as well, this is the second year in a row that Wroten has shown himself to be a starter-caliber player in the NBA, even if he is pretty ball-dominant.

5. Isaiah Canaan - PG 9.2ppg, 37% 3FG, 12.8 PER

It may be the time spent watching Canaan playing for the Rockets and hoisting 3 after 3 in the layups-and-3-pointers offense, but I just love watching Canaan shoot. He's a gifted scorer with a sweet stroke, and I'm a sucker for that combination. Canaan will probably never be even an adequate defender, but that's mostly due to his size: listed at 6'0'', he looks like Isaiah Thomas out there on the court - and Thomas is listed at 5'9''.

6. Thomas Robinson - PF 5.7ppg, 5.6rpg, 15.3 PER

Robinson was drafted with really high expectations after a really good career at Kansas, but has yet to live up to that standard of excellence. His ceiling, if he can reach it, is a kind of modern Charles Barkley-type, due to his ability to shoot, rebound, dribble, pass, and do basically everything in the big frame that he's got. Notice how much this roster breakdown features the term "potential"? The Sixers really are basketball's Houston Astros. And sadly, the long, Astros-like rebuild comes with lots of losses. Whatever, more ping-pong balls in the lottery for Philly!

7. Henry Sims - C 8.0ppg, 4.9rpg, 14.5 PER

Henry Sims is your prototypical "walk and chew gum at the same time" center - he doesn't score at a great rate, and doesn't rebound that well either. He's got great percentages, but that's mostly because most of his shot attempts come right at the basket. Ho hum.

8. Hollis Thompson - SG 8.8ppg, 40% 3FG, 11.0 PER

Dude can shoot, and likes to shoot, but can he do anything else? A mainstay in the Philly lineup given this roster, I think Thompson struggles to get minutes on a playoff-caliber team.

9. Luc Richard Mbah a Moute - PF 9.9ppg, 4.9rpg, 10.6 PER

The "old guy" on this team at 28 (Richardson, 34, only played in 19 games), Mbah a Moute doesn't do anything exceptionally well. His game fashions itself as "stretch-4", but he's kind of undersized to play power forward at 6'8'' (aka the same height as Golden State PG Shaun Livingston) in the NBA nowadays.

10. Ish Smith - PG 6.1ppg, 3.3apg, 12.3 PER

The fastest player in the NBA, as per multiple sources. However, speed isn't one of those "carrying tools" like 3-point shooting and rebounding ability.

11. Jason Richardson - SG 9.1ppg, 3.5rpg, 11.7 PER

A shell of his former self, J-Rich didn't play until February this season, after not playing a single NBA game in all of 2013-14. Dude can still shoot 3's a little bit, and jacked up 5 a game this season.

12. JaKarr Sampson - SG 5.2ppg, 2.2rpg, 9.4 PER

Sampson is a 6'9'' shooting guard. That's...insane. Also, for what it's worth, he found himself in the starting lineup in almost half of his games played. JaKarr Sampson is also a sneaky-good name, in that it's really fun to say out loud. But he doesn't hold a candle compared to...

13. Furkan Aldemir - PF 2.3ppg, 4.3rpg, 12.0 PER

Coolest name on this team (which is saying something), and probably top 5 in the whole league. Furkan. Aldemir. Try it yourself, it's fun!

14. Glenn Robinson III - SG 2.1ppg, 1.1rpg, 8.5 PER

Have we already tried to give Glenn Robinson III a nickname yet? Should it be completely based upon his dad's nickname, the Big Dog? Or should he blaze his own trail and find something separate to be known by? Big questions surrounding the Little Dog/GR3. None surrounding his actual play on the court, though.

15. Jerami Grant - SF 6.3ppg, 3.0rpg, 8.7 PER

Yeesh, the bottom of this list is filled with guys who really should be in the D-League.

Thursday, April 16, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Minnesota Timberwolves

Nothing ever changes, really.

1. Andrew Wiggins - SF 16.8ppg, 4.5rpg, 13.9 PER

The #1 overall draft pick last year (for the Cavaliers) has played in every game this season, is top 5 in minutes played in THE LEAGUE, and is already a great defender. Those who were expecting the Second Coming of LeBron James on the offensive end knew deep in their hearts that they were being ridiculous, but his offensive game isn't a train wreck. His game is less shooting and more athleticism currently, like many superstars that have come before him (see: Kobe, LeBron) - so there's still hope that his shooting numbers will increase as he grows into his "NBA game". He's a blue-chipper already, and the future is so bright because his high-ceiling potential seems like such a sure thing. I like Andrew Wiggins, if you couldn't tell.

2. Nikola Pekovic - C 12.5ppg, 7.5rpg, 0.39bpg, 16.7 PER

I also like Nikola Pekovic, and let's be real: his physical appearance likens him to Gimli, except tall (How terrifying a combination is that?! That would give Gimli a huge range for his axe, which was his major drawback. Seriously. Holy crap). Anyway. Pekovic is a monster on the boards in seemingly every game I watch of his, yet only averages 7.5/game. Why? I don't know, maybe I'm his good luck charm or something. The major drawbacks to Pekovic's game are health (he's never played more than 62 games in a season) and defense (see his pitiful blocks numbers above - HE'S 6'11'' AND WEIGHS 295 LBS). But when he's on, he's like a Montenegrin (yup, that's the correct demonym) Zach Randolph. And on this roster, that's good enough for 2nd.

3. Zach LaVine - PG 10.0ppg, 3.5apg, 11.0 PER

Zach LaVine can jump. And water is wet. But also, Zach LaVine can shoot too! 37% from 3-point range isn't anything to sneeze at, and he shot 94 of them, so that's a bunch of points coming in multiples of 3. I know the slam dunk competition doesn't count towards wins or losses for the Timberwolves on the season, so it really doesn't matter in the end, but LaVine showed a really easy confidence that made me feel more optimistic about his future.

4. Ricky Rubio - PG 10.3ppg, 8.8apg, 1.7spg, 15.3 PER

Woohoo! Pretty Tricky Ricky is here! Ricky Rubio makes watching/playing basketball seem more fun, and that honestly added into his ranking up this high. That is, it's fun until he's left alone on the 3-point line, and he goes all wide-eyed, and he clangs another shot off the back iron. Yup, Rubio still hasn't figured out that all-important aspect of the game: the shot. That didn't stop him from shooting though, 85% of his field goals attempted this year were jumpshots, with 35% of his 2's going in and an incredible 17% of his 3's finding the bottom of the net. That's not the good kind of incredible, either. Dude is a wizard on the defensive end though, and makes at least one pass per game that makes you cover your mouth and look away out of sheer respect for the hustle.

5. Kevin Martin - SG 19.7ppg, 39% 3FG, 16.4 PER

Kevin Martin doesn't play defense, doesn't pass, doesn't rebound, and doesn't tip well at restaurants. Ok, maybe that last one is an unfounded accusation. So why is he #4 on this list? Because Kevin Martin can flat out score. Inside, outside, fallaway J's, drawing fouls, the whole shebang. Kevin Martin has unconventional form, but it goes in more often than not.

6. Shabazz Muhammad - SF 13.5ppg, 39% 3FG, 20.0 PER

I think Shabazz must be learning from Kevin Martin, because his stat line emulates Martin's - sweet shooting, and not much else. For what it's worth, Muhammad led this team in 3FG%. So there's that.

7. Gary Neal - SG 11.8ppg, 35% 3FG, 15.2 PER

Mr. Never Cold is a plug-and-play bench scorer, and that kind of role is welcome on any team. Now, his scoring would definitely be more welcome on a team that actually plays in games that matter, but Gary Neal continues to shoot the ball well from everywhere he hoists it up. There's still some residual resentment from when he played for San Antonio, I'm not going to lie.

8. Gorgui Dieng - C 9.7ppg, 8.3rpg, 1.73bpg (!), 17.3 PER

Emeka Okafor 2.0 is an absolute force on the defensive end. Almost 2 blocks per game! Whew. I definitely didn't see that coming when I watched him play at Louisville. Hopefully he can add in some low-post moves to allow his defense to continue to shine.

9. Anthony Bennett - PF 5.2ppg, 3.7rpg, 11.4 PER

Yikes, this is ugly. If Gorgui is Emeka 2.0, then can Anthony Bennett be Kwame Brown 0.5?

10. Chase Budinger - SF 6.8ppg, 36% 3FG, 12.3 PER

Budinger didn't turn into the all-around player that some people thought he might've been.

11. Justin Hamilton - C 9.4ppg, 5.3rpg, 1.50bpg, 18.8 PER

Doesn't seem to be a scorer, doesn't have exceptional rebounding numbers, but has really pleasantly-surprising block numbers, especially for the amount of minutes he's playing.

12. Adreian Payne - PF 7.4ppg, 5.5rpg, 8.2 PER

The former standout at Michigan State has worked his way into the starting lineup, which is saying something. The rest of his game may still be in the college/pro-ball limbo, so the hope is that it continues to develop a la Greg Monroe.

13. Kevin Garnett - PF 7.6ppg, 5.2rpg, 19.4 PER (in 5 games with Minnesota)

The Big Ticket is back in Minny, giving T-Wolves fans over the age of 25 a reason to come to the Target Center. However, gone is the automatic 20-10 guy of the late-90's/early-00's, as Garnett is now a defensive mouthpiece on one end, and an endless loop of pick-and-pop 20-footers on the offensive side. KG keeps gettin' dem checks though, and continues to be the Barry Bonds of career earnings: setting the bar so high that no one may ever reach it ($315 million and counting).

14. Lorenzo Brown - PG 3.9ppg, 3.2apg, 10.5 PER

I didn't know who Brown was before I started doing this research, so the thing that elevates him above Hummel is that he fills out the stat sheet more. Splitting hairs, though.

15. Robbie Hummel - SF 4.4ppg, 3.0rpg, 10.1 PER

Dude was great at Purdue, though.

Oh, and one last thing...

2015 First-Round Playoffs Predictions (since you asked):
Western Conference
1 Warriors over 8 Pelicans in 5
2 Rockets over 7 Mavericks in 7
6 Spurs over 3 Clippers in 5
5 Memphis over 4 Trailblazers in 6

Eastern Conference
1 Hawks over 8 Nets in 4
2 Cavaliers over 7 Celtics in 5
3 Bulls over 6 Bucks in 6
5 Wizards over 4 Raptors in 7

Out-of-Left-Field Prediction:
Even though they'll inevitably succumb to the Bulls, the Milwaukee Bucks will be the 1st-round surprise breakout team, since they really haven't come to the public consciousness yet and they've got a nice little thing going up there. #fearthedeer (is that still a thing?)

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - New York Knicks

The 2014-15 NBA regular season is coming to a close, so now is really the best time to look back on the season that was. I'm a human, and therefore I like to rank things. Combining these two thoughts together compels me to rank every player in the NBA, right? Is that how logic works? Whatever, I've watched a LOT of League Pass, and I'm just sadistic enough to actually enjoy an undertaking like this.

Now, it seems impossible to just start ranking players out of the blue: Jordan Clarkson or Kent Bazemore? Kevin Garnett or Amare Stoudemire? So, I'm going to go team-by-team, and then at the end compile them all into a humongo-list of the 450 NBA players.

Important question, before we start: what's the criteria? Good question, Jordan. I'm ranking based on one question: who would I rather have, if I was an NBA GM? Thus, a player's salary is essentially only used as a tiebreaker between two otherwise-equal players, and an elite roleplayer can edge out an aging star, etc.

Since the playoffs are about to start, thus leaving 14 of the teams completely out of the public conscience, let's start at the bottom of the standings and work our way up. That's right! That means...the Knicks are on the clock! Damn, this is going to start out pretty ugly isn't it? Hopefully I can stick with this until it actually gets fun.

Without further ado, your 2014-15 New York Knickerbockers!

Best team nickname fashioned after a piece of outdated clothing, hands down. Sorry, Spurs.

The list:

1. Carmelo Anthony - SF (Injured) 24.2ppg, 6.6rpg, 21.6 PER

Don't overthink this one: Carmelo is by far the best player on this team even despite his increasing age (30) and high price tag ($22.4mil this season, or about as much as the Knicks are paying Amare Stoudemire - who you'll notice didn't make this list, because he plays for the Dallas Mavericks). Carmelo is an incredible shotmaker, even if that comes at the price of him being incredibly ball-dominant (32.9% usage rate). On a team like this, however, I'm sure his teammates are actually pretty content to let him dribble and shoot as he wishes.

2. Jose Calderon - PG 9.1ppg, 4.7apg, 11.4 PER

Leading the Knicks in assists, and the only 40% 3-point shooter on the team, Calderon fits a bunch of roles that just aren't utilized on a bad team.

3. Tim Hardaway Jr. - SG 11.1ppg, 11.6 PER

I'm ranking Hardaway Jr. this high purely based on his potential, based on flashes shown in midseason. His upside seems to be as a jumpshooter, although he definitely hasn't figured out the defensive side of the NBA game yet. That can change with more playing time though, and perhaps some of the defensive woes have come from simply playing on an apathetic, lottery-bound team.

4. Alexey Shved - G 14.8ppg, 4.6rpg, 3.6apg, 20.6 PER

Shved spent most of the year on the Sixers, padding his stats, then sat the bench for a short period with the Rockets, before finally getting a chance to play (and shine) with the Knicks. Shved fills out the entire stat sheet, and gets to the free-throw line fairly consistently, which is a plus. Hard to tell if he's a good stats, bad team guy, though.

5. Andrea Bargnani - C 14.8ppg, 4.4rpg, 16.7 PER

The former #1 overall pick never really panned out as a sweet-shooting big man. Really, the "stretch 5" part of his game just means that he doesn't factor into the rebounding game, and his 36% 3FG rate doesn't validate his position so far from the basket anyway. Weird to think that Bargs and LaMarcus Aldridge (now THAT is what a stretch 4 can really look like) went 1-2 in the '06 Draft.

(Coach Derek Fisher would rank here if he could actually suit up and play in games)

6. Langston Galloway - PG 11.6ppg, 4.3rpg, 3.2apg, 11.8 PER

An undrafted free agent, Galloway is taking the minutes that Shane Larkin apparently didn't want. A good-enough shooter, Galloway jumps off the stats sheet in rebounds: 3.5 defensive rebounds per game, and he's 6'2''! I appreciate point guards who work to get the ball back on offense.

7. Lance Thomas - SF 8.3ppg, 8.7 PER

Here's where it starts to get really ugly: Lance Thomas is your replacement for Melo, New York! You're only losing 16 points/game, and 13 points of PER in your starting lineup - oh wow, no wonder the Knicks are the worst team in the league.

8. Cole Aldrich - C 5.3ppg, 5.4rpg, 17.5 PER

When Aldrich went to Kansas, I thought he was an unstoppable force. Turns out, that may have been the peak of his powers. But Aldrich absolutely gets after it on the defensive end nowadays, and leads the team in rebounding rate by a comfortable margin. Hey, like Jalen Rose says - all a big man has to do is prove that he can walk and chew gum at the same time. Just look at Kendrick Perkins' career whenever you're feeling down, Cole. If he can do it, you can do it!

9. Cleanthony Early - SF 5.4ppg, 8.7 PER

I may have him ranked 4 spots too high here based solely on his FANTASTIC first/last name combo. And basketball is such a great sport to call out a guy's name to as you take an ill-advised jumper on the playground (Kobe!/Lebron!/Mosgov!). And I just love thinking about Marv Albert calling out a "Cleanthony Early!" in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference Finals (keep dreaming, Knicks fans). Do I have anything to say about Early's game? No.

10. Shane Larkin - PG 6.2ppg, 2.9apg, 10.9 PER

Barry Larkin's son! He needs to have a "carrying tool" (sorry for the baseball term, but it works here) in order to stick on a team. You can get better defensively, or improve your 3-point shooting, or work harder rebounding, but you've gotta have one thing that separates you from the rest of the world. Larkin has the pedigree, just not the results to show from that yet.

11. Jason Smith - PF 7.8ppg, 3.9rpg, 11.9 PER

A huge guy (7'0'') who can't shoot, and doesn't rebound. What is there to love?

12. Lou Amundson - PF 6.1ppg, 6.2rpg, 1.26bpg, 12.8 PER

Defensively solid, but that's not a standout point as most backup centers are good defensively in the NBA. Just don't ask Sweet Lou to shoot free throws (44% career).

13. Quincy Acy - PF 5.8ppg, 4.4rpg, 12.1 PER

Energy guy with a great beard. Reggie Evans 2.0?

14. Travis Wear - SF 3.9ppg, 8.6 PER

Who?

15. Ricky Ledo - SG 8.4ppg, 8.5 PER

Who?

Friday, March 23, 2012

That Concert Was Fun(.)!

This post could get really difficult in terms of linguistics and punctuation if I don't address this early on: I went to see the band "fun." in concert Tuesday night. This post is a review of the entire experience. For the duration of this post, and with no disrespect meant toward the band as a whole nor anyone associated with "fun.", I am referring to them as "Fun".

And on behalf of texters and tweeters everywhere, this is my message to the band: capitalize the F and drop the punctuation. Look what eliminating the "!" from their name got Panic at the Disco - an outraged fanbase. Nevermind, don't use them as the standard. But still, make it easier for us, your fans, to tell people about you!

Fun played at Warehouse Live this past Tuesday night in Houston, and by the time the forgettable opening act was done and the roadies had set up the stage and tuned the instruments, the place was packed. How many of the audience in attendance knew more than Fun's hit single "We Are Young"? I don't know, but I'd venture to say that that song by itself attracted more than a few people.

On the subject of "We Are Young", this is the first concert I have been to where the band has had a song that is currently tearing up radio waves and accumulating millions of YouTube hits. Watching the faces of the band when they played the song, finally succumbing to the audience's most anxiously-awaited part of the show, was interesting. Each member seemed tired of the song, but pleased that the crowd was enjoying the experience so much and knew every word. From comments made by lead singer Nate Ruess earlier in the show, the large crowds and general fame is a new experience for the band as a whole, so I'm happy for them that they're getting the true "rockstar treatment".

From the second the band walked onto the stage and the lights blared on, the whole concert was incredible. The lead singer, Ruess (don't worry, I have no idea how to pronounce that either), drove the whole show's tempo and feel, and from start to finish did a masterful job of it. The first bunch of songs were all high-energy and made the crowd dance and sing along with the band.

Ruess doesn't play any instruments during the show, and I was curious how it would affect the on-stage chemistry of the band. For most shows that I have been to, the lead singer plays some sort of guitar, and is therefore tied down to the front-and-center position on the stage. However, given his freedom of movement, Ruess basically was the bridge between the band's wall of sound and the crowd, and he shined in the midst of that collision.

The star of the show was obviously and utterly Nathaniel Ruess. While watching him perform, I had (what I thought was) an original comparison: this man is the closest I will ever see to Freddie Mercury. Fun's lead singer, much like the legendary mouthpiece of the Arena-Rock-Mount-Rushmore band Queen, has a voice like a canary, acts out the lyrics and emotions of the songs while he is singing on-stage, and has songs that are so dramatic that they deserve makeup and a cast to do them justice. However, the comparison between Ruess and Mercury is so common and well-documented that it is even featured on Ruess' wikipedia page. So much for an "original" idea.

The biggest surprise of the show was Fun's guitarist, Jack Antonoff. He was a ball of energy, shined in each solo he got to wail on, and looked like a mix between Ross Geller (Friends) and Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino to boot.

All in all, Fun was a lot of, well, fun! Their tour is just starting up, and if you get a chance to see them, I would highly recommend going to see them!

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Ben Rector and Needtobreathe Concert!

Wednesday night, NEEDTOBREATHE (don't worry, I will refer to them in a less-enthusiastic way for the duration of this post) and Ben Rector started their tour in Houston. And I went! It was one of the best concerts I've been to in a long time, and here are my thoughts about the highlights.

First off, both Ben Rector and Needtobreathe lead singer Bear Rinehart have the vocal strength and style that makes the live experience more like a CD-listening party than an unfortunate karaoke night. Both guys sounded so good throughout the night, and their voices being so strong really led the audience into a sing-along concert feeling.

For Ben Rector's portion of the concert, he did a great job of just being an opening act. He enlisted the help of the crowd to sing the chorus of one of his songs. He did his traditional impromptu writing of a third verse via audience suggestion. His finale song was a classy, timely cover of the late Whitney Houston's "I Wanna Dance With Somebody (Who Loves Me)". And through all of this, he got to show off his stellar vocal range and tone.

Then Needtobreathe came on and just blew my expectations out of the water. If you closed your eyes, you definitely could've convinced yourself that they just played the CD over the speakers. They rocked hard, Bear's voice rang out loud and growly over the top of all the music. The guys looked like a bundle of nervous energy (with it being the first night of the tour, that's totally cool with me), and every guitar solo and breakdown section of a song was pumped so full of energy and just pure rock 'n' roll. The band is going to get used to the crowd knowing every lyric through the rest of this tour - it seemed to kind of catch Rinehart off-guard when the crowd was effectively drowning him out at points.

With that slight negative aside, the connection between crowd and band was strong - and definitely escalated as the concert went on. This all culminated when, during the encore when all 5 guys were playing unplugged in a tight semicircle, the entire audience collectively shut up and just...listened. Rinehart, having stepped away from his turned-down microphone, belted out the refrain of the studly chorus from "Slumber". The emotional connection between the crowd and the singer at that point in time is something I've never felt before. Then, the band hit a final chord and walked off the stage, and the audience just kind of sat stunned before coming to our collective senses and applauding. I know that concerts are largely a practice in crowd manipulation, but that refreshing take on an encore didn't seem forced - it seemed natural and just special, honestly.

All told, the concert was an incredible experience. It combined the luxuries of a big-time concert with all the intimacy of a living room jam session. If you have a chance to see this tour when they come (near) to you, I highly suggest you take the time. If this post catches you a day or two late, never fear! that's what iTunes (or let's be honest: Spotify - welcome to 2012) is for! Check out any and all of both these bands' music, I can assure you that you won't be disappointed.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Chandler Parsons or Chase Budinger?

In watching the Houston Rockets lose tonight to the Milwaukee Bucks, a question occured to me: Why is Chandler Parsons playing so much instead of Chase Budinger? Budinger started the year in the starting 5, and has since been relegated to towel-waving sub in recent games. In looking at their stats, they seem to be much the same. So what's the difference in these two Caucasian forwards whose first names start with "C-H-A"?

Here are some of John Hollinger's PER stats on both players (PER is adjusted on a per-minute basis):

Chase Budinger, 6'7'', 3rd year

20.7 minutes/game

51% field goal percentage

9.5 assists/game

7.9 turnovers/game

8.6 rebounds/game

11.44 PER

Chandler Parsons, 6'9'', Rookie

23 minutes/game

48.6% field goal percentage

16.2 assists/game

8.8 turnovers/game

13.7 rebounds/game

14.66 PER

What's the difference between the two? And what has pushed Parsons into "starter" status?

First, Parsons passes more without costing much in terms of turnovers. Watching Budinger, he sees himself at the receiver of passes - and once he gets the ball, he's looking to score more often than not. That's not necessarily a bad thing; lots of players (cough Kobe cough) operate better within their team (cough cough Melo) when they're "the guy". However, unfortunately for Budinger, the Rockets already have one of those (ahem...Kevin Martin). As far as Parsons is concerned, he seems just as happy to set someone up as he is to shoot the ball. He hustles around the court, and he just gets open due to that relentless motor.

The other main difference between "Chandler Bang" and "Bud"'s stats is the rebounding rate. Parsons is two inches taller than Budinger, but Parsons knows how to make his size a huge deal when he's playing inside (offensive or defensively). CP plays like a power forward with the athleticism of a shooting guard. Budinger plays like the key is made of hot lava - he lives on the wings, and then only ventures inside on his patent-pending baseline dunks. He plays like a shooting guard with the size of a small forward.

One last comment on Parsons: in this, his rookie season, it feels like he's completely unaware of the stakes. He's playing like a 10-year old on a youth basketball team: hustling everywhere, taking the ball up the court on occasion, doing his post-game interviews with an orange-peel-smile. One of those may actually have been made up. However, this obliviousness is just making Parsons play with a joy and carefree air that makes him already one of the more clutch players on the team. Hopefully he can keep that aspect of his game up throughout his career.

All told, I think that Coach Kevin McHale is riding the hot hand, since Parsons has been on fire recently. However, for the reasons stated above, I think the right move is to keep playing Parsons as much as possible. He brings a relentless character to this Rockets team that they'll need to imitate if they hope to go far in the playoffs this season. Thankfully we can't get matched up with the Bucks until the Finals.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Bucket List

I love lists. In a typical day, I'll make a dozen different lists that fit whatever I'm thinking and doing for that day. My mom says I do this because I have an analytical mind. I tell her that she's analyzing me by saying that - but I mean...I'd agree with her.

The thing about lists, in general, is this: each item on a list is inherently begging, SCREAMING to be checked off. My freshman year English teacher, Mrs. Shank (the best English teacher I've ever had), told our class that when you make a list, you should make the tasks achievable because checking off a task is an emotional boost. This "bucket list" flies in the face of that advice, to a degree, but my reasoning is as follows: every item on this list is set up to be a kind of "life achievement award," not something flippant like a to-do list for a Saturday. With each task I (hopefully) eliminate from this list, the feeling is that it is a significant milestone being passed. How apt is that description to my list? Eh, some of these goals are altogether too lofty. But I'm not making a bucket list that I want to complete - I hope to have plenty to work on throughout my life.

One last clarification, I wrote this list in spurts, as things popped into my head. I'm basically publishing this to display my inner dialogue - plus, I have way too many notes saved on my iphone, let's be honest. So this list is very "stream of consciousness," and is only edited to clarify my own personal short-hand.

So without further ado, here is my "list of things to do before you kick the bucket" (thank you Morgan Freeman and Jack Nicholson):

- Run with the bulls in Pamplona Spain
- Live in manhattan
- Do stand-up comedy
- Get a pilots license
- Go to Coachella/SXSW/ACL

- Be a general manager of an MLB team
- Travel to every continent (as an adult)
- Learn an Asian language
- Learn Italian
- Run a marathon
- Run a half-marathon
- Run a 10k
- Run a 5k
- Bungee jump
- Witness the Northern Lights
- Write a book
- Take dance lessons of some sort (to proficiency)
- Watch The Wire
- Watch The Sopranos
- Watch Lost
- Visit Boston
- Go to all 30 MLB stadiums
- Go to the Super Bowl
- Go to the BCS national championship game
- Go to all 4 tennis opens
- Go to The Masters
- Learn how to bake something good from someone else's homemade recipe
- Go to Hawaii
- Go to Old Trafford and see Man U play
- Read all the way through the Bible
- Read a book in its native language
- Release an album of original songs
- Successfully complete the gallon challenge
- Eat the Big Texan dinner in Amarillo
- Climb mount Kilimanjaro
- Go white water rafting
- Break a Guinness world record
- Learn to drive a motorcycle
- Machu Picchu
- See the cherry blossom festival in Washington DC
- Go on a date with Rachel mcadams
- Mardi Gras in New Orleans
- Solve a Rubiks cube
- Get a degree from Stanford
- Get a degree from Harvard

- Read all of Shakespeare

- Read all of Sherlock Holmes

- Watch all of the James Bond movies

- Watch all of the Oscar Best Picture Award winners

Monday, January 23, 2012

Taking Down Dos Lobos

Tonight, the Houston Rockets took their 6-game winning streak into the Target Center in Minneapolis. This season, the Rockets have been equal parts Jekyll and Hyde when they are at home or away, respectively. At home in the Toyota Center, the hometown boys are 7-1, while on the road they came into the night sporting an abysmal 2-6 record. So taking on Minnesota in the (Timber)wolves' den is just what the Rockets needed to transfer their home success to the road as well.

Houston controlled most of the game, although Minny had a couple dangerous runs that even gave them a lead in the middle of the 3rd quarter. However, Houston ended up winning 107-92. With the win, the Rockets improve to 10-7 while the Wolves drop to 7-10. The Rockets key performer probably was Kyle "Mr. Triple-Double" Lowry, who provided 16 points, 10 rebounds, and 10 assists. Kevin Martin was no slouch, finishing with 31 points of his own.

The Wolves are basically a band of merry men surrounding their All-Star/All-World/All-Universe power forward Kevin Love, who finished with 39 points and 12 rebounds. He is relentless on the boards, especially offensively, and his inclusion of a 3-pointer into his game mixes low and high extremely well. As for the sidekicks, this year has been a kind of culmination for lots of Minnesota General Manager David Khan's experiments: namely 2011 #2 overall pick Derrick Williams out of Arizona and the #5 overall pick from the 2009 draft Ricky Rubio. As this is Rubio's first year coming to the NBA from his native Spain, the effect on Minnesota is having two Top-5 picks added to your team in the same year.

The aforementioned newcomers are playing well: the wildly-popular Rubio (1/2 of Minnesota's "Dos Lobos" Spanish contigent, along with injured guard J.J. Barea) is making his mark in the league as a distributor and good defensive player, while Williams really needs to look no further than teammate Michael Beasley to model his game as an offensive-minded wingman. As the year goes on, Minnesota can look to continue to build the rapport of their young nucleus of Love/Rubio/Williams and hopefully bring great chemistry down the stretch of this year and into next season. They have room to grow, but as was evident in large stretches tonight, these Timberwolves aren't playing very well.

So what does this win say about the Rockets? The importance of a road win cannot be understated, especially coming off of an emotional win against the rival San Antonio Spurs. The triple-double by Lowry serves as an announcement to the league, a coming-out party of sorts, that K-Low is here and he is one of the best point guards in the world. Kevin Martin keeps proving that he can score anywhere and everywhere, even though his insistence on shooting fast-break 3's continually makes me nauseous regardless of how many he makes. Samuel Dalembert has really made his own niche as a rebounder, cleaning up the glass on both ends of the court. Also, his innate sense of shotblocking is a key to the Rockets' defense.

From watching Houston play for much of this season, it is my opinion that these are the Rockets' two best lineups. First, the "normal" lineup that should be used throughout the course of the game consists of center Dalembert, power forward Luis Scola, small forward (rookie!) Chandler Parsons, shooting guard Martin, and point guard Lowry. In crunch time, however, a smaller lineup is really paying dividends by allowing both of H-Town's dynamic point guards to get some key minutes: "center" Patrick Patterson, and then guards Lowry, Goran Dragic, Courtney Lee, and Martin. These two lineups have been playing incredibly well, and it has been a big part of the Rockets' current 7-game winning streak.

With the win, the Rockets now move into the 8-seed in the Western Conference. Who's next?! That would be the Milwaukee Bucks, who travel to Houston to try to steal a win at the Toyota Center tomorrow night.

Friday, January 13, 2012

The Boys Are Back!

Tonight, the Houston Rockets defeated the Sacramento Kings, 103-91. With the win, the Rockets improve to 4-7 on the season, while the Kings fall to 4-8. The Rockets and Kings are the 12th- and 13th-seeded teams in the NBA's Western Conference, far from being current playoff contenders. So this begs the question: who cares? Well obviously, I do. And so should you, if you're a Rockets fan.

The Rockets played well. Really well. And I believe that this is the blueprint for future Rockets success. With the current roster, all the pieces are in place for Houston to make a run at a playoff spot - they just need to consistently replicate the model of tonight's game.

The defense played pretty well, getting a big inside presence from Samuel Dalembert and his season-high 4 blocks. With Luis Scola's inability to challenge shots vertically, Dalembert should play a big role for the Rockets as the anchor of their defense.

Kyle Lowry is proving himself to be one of the better point guards in the league. Mr. "Near-Triple-Double" fills out every aspect of the stat sheet, and the rest of the team takes after his hard-nosed, hustle style of play.

Luis Scola had everything going through him on the offensive end. This helped in two ways: by giving the ball to Scola in the high post area, he can easily kick it out to any open teammate if/when a double-team comes; and if no double-team comes, Scola can go to any of the Bill Worrell-patented "Ice Cream Man" scoop shots that his post game consists of.

Kevin Martin is doing the things that Kevin Martin should. He's an underrated shooting guard in the NBA, and he adds more offensively than he takes away on the defensive end. Chase Budinger mixes in sharpshooting on the 3-point line with an ability to elevate and aggressively slash to the basket, and the whole package comes together very nicely.

Chandler Parsons has been astounding, honestly. The rookie has played as a Chase Budinger-wannabe, and is acted the part in spades recently. He can shoot a fair amount of 3's, and then his size allows him to play inside also on defense.

On the bench, Goran Dragic, Terrence Williams, and Patrick Patterson are playing well enough to contribute to Houston's success. Then, anything that Jordan Hill, Jonny Flynn, and former D-Leaguers Hasheem Thabeet (ha!) and Jeff Adrien can add in random games will only be gravy that adds to the Rockets' inevitable postseason push.

If the Houston Rockets are smart, they'll use this seemingly-innocuous game on the schedule as their plan for the rest of the season. If they do, they'll make the 2012 NBA playoffs - write it down!

Monday, December 19, 2011

Hugo

This past weekend, a friend asked me if I'd like to go see a PG-rated movie. Having just seen the new Muppets movie (which I liked, actually), I was not particularly anxious to go see another movie deemed so "tame" by MPAA standards. However, being the amazing friend that I am (if I do say so myself), I alit from my cloud of condescension to go see "Hugo".

As we're sitting through previews beforehand, I'm told that the movie is directed by Martin Scorsese (and co-directed by Johnny Depp). So I readjust my expectations slightly, although still remaining nonplussed. Then, the movie starts.

From the outset, it is evident how Scorsese does such a great job of telling this incredible story, which is adapted from a short story originally written by Brian Selznick. It is fascinating to watch as the main character, Hugo Cabret, crawls, slides, and climbs around the walls of the Paris train station that doubles as his home.

I notice that, all in all, there is not much dialogue throughout the movie. Therefore, the non-verbal communication between characters is magnified. The orphan Hugo wades through a myriad of difficult emotions, and as is understandable, he conveys his emotions through body language and facial expressions more often than words. The old man (George Melies, played by Ben Kingsley), kind of steals the show theatrically as he runs the gamut of emotions throughout the movie.

The (real-life, apparently) character of George Melies is absolutely captivating. After Hugo and his friend (Melies' god-daughter) unearth the truth behind the shopkeeper's secret past (Spoiler Alert!), the next 15 minutes of the movie is a montage of Melies' actual turn-0f-the-century films, restored and brought to life in wonderful 3-D. The prominent film used in the movie, "A Trip to the Moon", can be seen here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JDaOOw0MEE

The main component of the movie that made it so enjoyable was the 3-D. Props to the movie industry, as they've improved 3-D glasses so they are no longer cumbersome and annoying to wear. It just makes it easier to focus on what I came to see, instead of paying extra for a ticket just to fiddle with the glasses the whole time and miss key parts of the movie.

As with many of the newer 3-D movies coming out nowadays, "Hugo" made excellent use of the technology featured in this medium. Some movies, like "Toy Story 3", are made more enjoyable by the presence of the 3-D capabilities. However, the truly transcendent 3-D movies, like "Avatar", make the technology seem truly necessary for it to be enjoyed correctly. "Hugo" definitely asserted itself as a transcendent 3-D movie, and the usage was perfect: it propelled the story further, gave life to scenes which would have otherwise been difficult to visualize, and wasn't ever cheesy.

The emotional themes shown throughout "Hugo" made the movie worthwhile: Hugo's search for love and acceptance and purpose following the loss of his father (played by Jude Law, an added bonus); Melies' revitalization as a success, not forgotten although time has not been kind to his art; and the heartwarming forgiveness and mercy that the station patrolman (played by Sacha Baron Cohen, another surprise!) learns through his encounters with the station's florist.

Needless to say, I was amazed by the movie. The combination of the interesting plot, the character development (verbal and non), the historical aspect of George Melies' lifework, and the tasteful, vital use of 3-D technology made "Hugo" one of my favorite movies of the year. Go see it before it's reduced to a 2-dimensional screen!

Monday, December 12, 2011

Behold King Pigskin

In the United States today, sports are a focal point of our culture. Different sports can serve in different roles in our lives. Baseball, like a beloved family dog, is always there for you, never requiring your full attention. Football, like a new sports car, can't be overused so as to dull its sheen, but demands your full attention and works in a strict "weekends only" zone. Hockey (or heck, even soccer) like sushi, is for those with a sense of adventure and a curiosity to experience foreign cultures.

For a small part of December, each of the major four (five with soccer) American sports was active in some respect. The NHL and NFL (and soccer leagues around the globe) are in the middle of their regular seasons, the MLB is working through its winter meetings (featuring blockbuster signings of stars like Albert Pujols), and the NBA has been working its way back into the national stream of consciousness after being mired in a long players' union lockout. So the obvious question is: which sport is America's favorite?

Football - American football, of course - reigns supreme. And it's not even close. This past weekend's games are a testament to the amazing drama that surrounds the NFL, week in and week out. In the Houston television market, this is what a day as a football fan looks like, taking December 11th's schedule as an example:

Noon (CBS) - The Houston Texans (10-3), led by their undrafted rookie quarterback T.J. Yates, go into the Bengals' den and defeat Cincinnati (7-6), led by their own rookie quarterback Andy Dalton (a native Texan), on a last-second touchdown.

3:00 (F0x) - The AFC West-leading Denver Broncos (8-5), behind the leadership of their media-lightning-rod and consummate winner, quarterback Tim Tebow, outlast the Chicago Bears (7-6) in overtime in Denver. Thanks in part to the mile-high conditions, Broncos kicker Matt Prater hits two breathtaking, long field goals: a game-tying 59-yarder and the overtime 51-yarder.

7:30 (NBC) - In the only night game on the NFL schedule, two NFC East rivals meet in Dallas as the New York Giants (7-6) square off against the division-leading Cowboys (7-6). The teams trade blows for the entire game, ultimately ending in Giants defensive lineman Jason Pierre-Paul blocking Cowboys kicker Dan Bailey's potentially game-tying field goal in the game's waning moments. With the win, the Giants move into a tie with the Cowboys atop the NFC East.

Three games, three last-second finishes. Even amid four other major sports going through some pretty big news weeks (the Pujols signing, the drama surrounding New Orleans Hornets point guard Chris Paul as he seeks to be traded), the NFL captures all the headlines. How? The football that is being played on the field is simply...spectacular.

Saturday, November 19, 2011

The Mile-High Messiah

Tim Tebow is a lightning rod. With his natural penchant for attracting critics and supporters alike, along with his leadership ability, it's a shame that Tebow can't be elected President in the future (he was born in Makati City, Philippines, to Baptist missionary parents). Outside of the sports media hotbeds of New York and Boston, very few players in any sport attract as much attention, positive or negative, as the Denver Broncos quarterback. The 1st round, 25th-overall 2010 NFL draft pick was viewed by some media personalities (like NBC's Tony Dungy) as being selected too low, and was viewed as drastically overrated by others (like ESPN NFL draft guru Mel Kiper Jr.).

After leading his team to a win this Thursday night over the New York Jets, Tim Tebow is 4-1 as an NFL starter. Given his 34-6 record as the quarterback at the University of Florida, an SEC powerhouse that plays few "easy" games each year, this should seem somewhat logical. However, Tebow finds his skills doubted and his successes undermined seemingly every week both by the media and public opinion.

Broncos coach John Fox and Executive Vice President of Football Operations (and legendary Broncos quarterback) John Elway have inherited Tim Tebow. Neither man was on staff when Tebow was drafted, and both were being skewered weekly in the local media during the Broncos' 1-4 start to the 2011 season. Public opinion can become an unstoppable wave of momentum, and it seems like Fox's hand was forced into benching starter Kyle Orton going into week 7.

On October 11th, the Broncos named Tebow the starting quarterback for their game against the Miami Dolphins, and the public got its wish. However, six days later, the Broncos traded 2010-Pro Bowl wide receiver Brandon Lloyd to the St. Louis Rams...for only a conditional 2012 draft pick.

In addition to stripping Tebow of his most talented and most reliable receiver, the Broncos front office had more thoughts concerning their newly-anointed "savior." Coach Fox took a buzzsaw to the playbook, removing complex pass plays, a staple to any NFL team, adding in numerous multiple-option running plays (usually only used in the collegiate or high school levels), and running a whopping 79% of their plays from the shotgun (as opposed to the "pro-style" formation of having a quarterback under center).

At first glance, this seems awfully nice of Fox: he's trying to put Tebow in the situations in which he excelled most as the Florida Gators' quarterback. However, put in a different light, it might seem that Fox is trying to bring Tebow's flaws to light. By "dumbing down" the playbook to Tebow's collegiate level, Fox is essentially pitting an amateur quarterback against professional defenses.

What do Fox and the Broncos front office stand to gain from showing Tebow as the rookie that he is? If public opinion falters in its support of Tebow, Fox and Elway could then have the freedom to put the team that they want on the field without backlash from their fans. I don't think that either Fox or Elway dislike Tebow as a person, nor do I think that either wants him to fail as a professional. However, the actions that have been taken by the Broncos as they relate to Tebow seem to be much like a father letting his son try something for the first time. He knows that the son isn't equipped to succeed, and that the son will return to the father humbled and hopefully eager to learn from the father's experience.

However, Tebow doesn't seem like the type to be obstinate in his talents. He seems humble and eager already, so why not treat him as such? Mr. Elway and Coach Fox, treat Tebow like an NFL quarterback. Feed him an NFL-style playbook, a little at a time. Force him to learn how to pass in a way that will allow him to succeed for years as your quarterback of the future. As all of America knows from his public "promise" following Florida's loss to the University of Mississippi in 2008, he is willing to play harder than anyone we've ever seen.

Monday, November 14, 2011

The Sing-Off Top 5

The Sing-Off starts off this week's episode with 5 groups remaining, and the week's theme is R&B. With that said, the opening number blended old school with new wave by starting with James Brown, then moving to the Jackson 5, and ultimately finishing with Beyonce's "Crazy in Love." In each episode, these opening songs are such a great part of the show, and this is one of my favorites of the season. Here are my thoughts on each group's performances of the night:

Dartmouth Aires - Ignition (Remix), Midnight Train to Georgia

They have such a great community feel to them, and with their five (or six?) leads that kept passing off the melody, it accomplished that goal of communal song. They've been really reliant on just one lead for the past couple weeks, so it was nice to prove that they're not a one-man show with this song. It was also just so much fun, these guys are the party starters and they made me smile from the first beat. Their old school song was a choral arrangement more than a fun Broadway thing like they usually do. They went back to their bread-and-butter lead, and it really seemed like a concert instead of a competition. These guys bring the crowd up on stage with them emotionally, and it's really a refreshing dynamic.

Urban Method - Knock You Down, It's Your Thing

This song definitely was right in their wheelhouse, but the fact remains that I'm not a fan of their female voices. It was one of their best performances on the show, and the tall dude with the mohawk is their X-factor. For this song they put him on bass....because that's where the dam is leaking the most. But he's good enough to be their lead, so big ups to him for being versatile. Their second song was mostly a pass-it-off song of drum solos between the guys while the ladies screeched in the background. I feel like anything the judges are saying positively about their performance is pure sugar-coating at this point. They deserved to go home this week, just like each of the past 3 weeks. I wonder if they sound much better live?

Vocal Point - Every Little Step, Ain't Too Proud To Beg

Such a departure from their usual sound - but they pulled it off so well! The breakdown in the middle quite possibly was the best 30 seconds of the show to date, between a sick beatboxer, great, guilty-pleasure-dance moves, and then some remix effects on the last chorus. I thoroughly enjoyed it. Their classic R&B choice was a Temptations song, and they busted out their deep voice to lead this one. It wasn't quite tight as it neared the end of the song, and I felt like there were a few pitch issues, but it's near-impossible to not like these guys! Seeing them leave was difficult because they have such star power, but they haven't been as consistent as some of the other groups, so their departure is defensible.

Afro-Blue - We Belong Together, Best of My Love

Taking on Mariah Carey, their groove was flawless throughout the song. Their bass is so fluid and just plain solid, and the guys provide such a great foundation for the female vocals to use as a springboard. The lead was so good, and didn't try to emulate Mariah, which is impossible - but rather, she just did what she could, and it worked. Their old school song was one that I've never heard before, but it seemed to be right in their kitchen. With their lead Danielle, they've got someone who is strong enough to lead their ensemble of girls, but with a vocal tone that sits so well within what the male voices bring. These guys probably won't win it all, but that will be America's fault, and definitely nothing that they've done wrong.

Pentatonix - OMG, Let's Get It On

Having their incredible lead take on Usher is a great comparison, and their arrangement was just. so. good. They have the beat/bass drop out at the right moments, and when they do, they can just go with their super-tight trio. Then, without skipping a beat, the two guys can join back in and bring in a huge momentum boost to the group. It was such a good vocal, and these guys are so far ahead from everybody else that it's not even funny. Then, they take a Marvin Gaye song (a personal favorite) and put just the right amount of their own spin on it...and absolutely murder it. Such a great performance, and there were no tricks to it - just great singing. Also, with Kevin's sticking up for his religious beliefs, I just fall more in love with these guys as a group each week.

Going into the Final Four, here are my power rankings:

1. Pentatonix

2. Dartmouth Aires

3. Afro-Blue

4. Urban Method

Monday, November 7, 2011

Back to The Sing-Off

After quite a lay-off, I decided to blog about today's episode of The Sing-Off. Coming into this episode, I'd say that the power rankings look like this (taking into account the whole season to date):

1. Pentatonix

2. Dartmouth Aires

3. Afro-Blue

4. Vocal Point

5. Delilah

6. Urban Method

To be honest, I think the eliminations have gone pretty much as they should throughout the show. Now, any group except for Urban Method can win it and I don't think it would be an injustice. However, I still think that Pentatonix fits what the judges look for - they're a small, close-knit group with individualized roles for each person. Looking at the past winners (Nota and Committed), Pentatonix seems to fit the mold the most.

The Arcade Fire song to start the show was actually really cool, and I like how the numbers are getting down to the point where everyone can fit on stage without it looking like the kid's cattle race at the rodeo. Here are my thoughts on each group's two performances:

Pentatonix - Their rock song was "Born To Be Wild," and I loved some things about it. The big silence before they started the chorus was a great effect, and they just have the best bass/beatboxer in the whole show and their trio of singers fit well together. However, minus points for hilariously awful fashion. I was nervous about what song they would pick to do for country, since they're so techno/dubsteppy. A Sugarland song had the good high melody that Pentatonix needs for their trio of singers, and then whoa! Out of nowhere they bust out a reggae groove for one of the choruses, and then they come back to their perfect blend for the end. They're gonna win the whole thing.

Dartmouth Aires - After last week's really awesome Queen medley, they did "We're Not Gonna Take It" and it was really great! I liked the back-and-forth between the two leads and the school choir bit right at the end. They used to have trouble deciding who would be their lead, but it seems that the black dude, Michael, has taken that role by storm. If I had a complaint, it seemed, like all of D'Aires' songs, to be really treble-y. Their country song was "Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy" and it was very different from what they usually do. However, it wasn't bad - it definitely had a line dance feel to it, and the singing wasn't opera-quality, but what can you expect from some boys from Hanover, New Hampshire?

Afro-Blue - The resident jazz group took on "American Girl" by Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers, and their "rock" sound just wasn't very rock-y. I thought the national anthem in the middle was...kind of random, but it sounded good? It was interesting. THEN, they had to do a country song: basically, they were gonna be screwed going into this week. Lady Antebellum was probably one of the best song choices they could pick, and they brought their intelligent arrangement style to this, with their bass being really evident of that. However, I didn't think it was emotional enough to have the girls crying at the end of the song, so that kind of confused me watching them wipe tears away while they're being judged. Guess you just had to be there.

Delilah - An all-girl group has to sing a rock song? I guess if they're not going to do a Heart song, they might as well cover Steven Tyler. "Dream On" is one of my favorite Aerosmith songs, so maybe I'm just more critical of it. The lead girl had some real pitch problems on a couple high notes, but with her Steven Tyler impression, she showed she's definitely got some pipes. It didn't quite fit my expectations. For the country portion, they covered The Band Perry and got back to their strength of slow songs sung with lots of emotion. However, this also brought back more unnerving closeups of Miss Skinhead. Great lead by the other blonde girl - she did a whole heap of justice to the song. It was moving and very well-sung, at least to my ear. I'm so very, very surprised that they got kicked off, and while I think that they shouldn't have gone home this week, their time was coming soon.

Urban Method - The group with a rapper sings...Whitesnake? Whatever, they completely changed it up and made it "modern." If my snark isn't obvious enough, it seemed like a desperate move by a group that feels that their collective backs are against the wall. I didn't like it. Their country song was Carrie Underwood's "Before He Cheats," and it's obvious at this point that they're relying on the main girl lead's strength to carry them whenever they can't have their rapper take center stage. However, I just really don't think that their girls are strong enough - I didn't like it. I absolutely disagree with their progression to next week.

Vocal Point - The Mormons sing "You Really Got Me" while wearing white, frilly shirts. Sure, just how I predicted it. It started slow, which I actually really liked, and these guys change keys so freaking well. Their lead is like the 5th or 6th out of their 9 to lead a song, and he was just as good as everyone else. Dang boi. Then, what country song would a group of tenors sing? Oh yeah, Rascal Flatts! "Life Is A Highway" was a little too fast for me, but I loved seeing these straitlaced guys wearing black cowboy hats and huge longhorn belt buckles. Again, they change keys as seamlessly as anyone in the whole game - the song was pretty good.

So the power rankings after this week are as follows:

1. Pentatonix

2. Dartmouth Aires

3. Vocal Point

4. Afro-Blue

15. Urban Method (I'm bitter.)

I am a man. I am a poet. I am redeemed.

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Denver Nuggets

Saturday, April 25, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Sacramento Kings

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Orlando Magic

Monday, April 20, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Los Angeles Lakers

Saturday, April 18, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Philadelphia 76ers

Thursday, April 16, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - Minnesota Timberwolves

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Ranking Every Player in the NBA - New York Knicks

Friday, March 23, 2012

That Concert Was Fun(.)!

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Ben Rector and Needtobreathe Concert!

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Chandler Parsons or Chase Budinger?

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Bucket List

Monday, January 23, 2012

Taking Down Dos Lobos

Friday, January 13, 2012

The Boys Are Back!

Monday, December 19, 2011

Hugo

Monday, December 12, 2011

Behold King Pigskin

Saturday, November 19, 2011

The Mile-High Messiah

Monday, November 14, 2011

The Sing-Off Top 5

Monday, November 7, 2011

Back to The Sing-Off

Blog Archive

About Me